Information Effect in Taxi Service Double Auction with Opportunity Cost: An Experimental Analysis

Authors

  • Suthatip Pueboobpaphan Suranaree University of Technology University
  • Nakorn Indra-Payoong Burapha University
  • Rattaphol Pueboobpaphan Suranaree University of Technology University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.1.77

Abstract

Inspired by the taxi refusal problem, we propose a double auction for taxi services with a variable supply-and-demand fare surcharge. In contrast to a conventional commodity double auction, our taxi service auction involves an opportunity cost that generally increases with time. Therefore, the bidding behaviour differs from that reported in the literature. We investigate experimentally the effects on bidding behaviour of the opportunity costs and private values of drivers and passengers, as well as of the types of given information. In addition, we compare the realized benefits between passengers and drivers. The results show that the degree of sensitivity to private value differs with opportunity cost and that transaction statistics vary with types of the information given to bidders. Moreover, we found that providing more information to bidders does not necessarily lead to better market performance and that giving suitable information to bidders could lead to a balanced benefit between passenger and driver.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Suthatip Pueboobpaphan

School of Transportation Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology University, Nakhonratchasima 30000, Thailand

Nakorn Indra-Payoong

Faculty of Logistics, Burapha University, Chonburi 20013, Thailand

Rattaphol Pueboobpaphan

School of Transportation Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology University, Nakhonratchasima 30000, Thailand

Published

Vol 22 No 1, Jan 31, 2018

How to Cite

[1]
S. Pueboobpaphan, N. Indra-Payoong, and R. Pueboobpaphan, “Information Effect in Taxi Service Double Auction with Opportunity Cost: An Experimental Analysis”, Eng. J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 77-91, Jan. 2018.

Most read articles by the same author(s)